Explore more publications!

UK MPs Clash Over Bid to Investigate Starmer in Mandelson Row

(MENAFN) A heated exchange took place in the House of Commons on Tuesday as lawmakers debated calls for an inquiry into allegations that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer misled Parliament regarding the appointment of Lord Mandelson as Britain’s US ambassador.

Lord Mandelson was appointed to the post in December 2024 but was later removed in September after Downing Street said new information had surfaced concerning the extent of his past relationship with convicted US sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Leading the Conservative response, party leader Kemi Badenoch argued that it was “very obvious” the prime minister had provided Parliament with statements that were “not correct,” intensifying pressure for an official investigation.

However, MPs from Starmer’s Labour Party rejected the proposal, describing the push for an inquiry and the anticipated vote as a political “stunt.”

Stephen Flynn, who leads the Scottish National Party at Westminster, also criticized the prime minister, saying Starmer’s position should have become untenable earlier. He argued that resignation should have followed when Starmer told MPs he had been aware of Mandelson’s links to Epstein prior to the ambassadorial appointment.

“That should have been curtains for him,” Flynn said, adding that Starmer is “not fit because his judgment was flawed, and it was wrong.”

He further accused Labour MPs of previously choosing to “proactively ignore that and to defend him” during earlier stages of the controversy.

MENAFN29042026000045017640ID1111046695


Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Legal Disclaimer:

EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.

Share us

on your social networks:
AGPs

Get the latest news on this topic.

SIGN UP FOR FREE TODAY

No Thanks

By signing to this email alert, you
agree to our Terms & Conditions